London Construction Magazine
Reach London's Construction Industry
82,000+ UK professionals · Contractors · Engineers · Developers
Banners from
£175/mo
Advertise Now

Corrections Policy

Last updated: 7 May 2026

London Construction Magazine is committed to accuracy, transparency, accountability and responsible reporting across all published content. This Corrections Policy explains how London Construction Magazine handles factual errors, clarifications, updates, amendments, correction requests and retractions.

The purpose of this policy is to ensure that published information remains as accurate, traceable and reliable as reasonably possible, particularly where articles relate to construction regulation, compliance, project delivery, safety, commercial exposure or professional-risk topics.

Commitment to Accuracy

London Construction Magazine aims to publish content that is factually accurate, evidence-based and responsibly presented.

Before publication, articles may be reviewed for:
  • accuracy of names, dates, figures and locations;
  • regulatory references and standards;
  • project details and company information;
  • source alignment and attribution;
  • clarity of interpretation and wording;
  • risk of misleading or unsupported claims.

Despite these processes, errors may occasionally occur. Where mistakes are identified, London Construction Magazine aims to correct them promptly and transparently.

Types of Corrections

Minor Corrections

Minor corrections are small edits that do not materially affect the meaning, interpretation or factual understanding of an article.

Examples may include:
  • spelling mistakes;
  • grammar issues;
  • formatting problems;
  • minor wording adjustments;
  • non-material typographical errors.

Minor corrections may be made without a visible correction notice.

Substantive Corrections

Where an error materially affects factual accuracy, interpretation, project understanding, commercial meaning or regulatory context, London Construction Magazine may add a visible correction notice.

Examples may include:
  • incorrect project details;
  • incorrect dates, locations or names;
  • incorrect quotations or attributions;
  • incorrect financial or technical data;
  • misleading regulatory interpretation;
  • incorrect references to standards, legislation or compliance requirements.

Where appropriate, a visible note may be added to the article such as:

Correction: This article was updated on [date] to correct [brief description of issue].

Article Updates

Construction projects, investigations, planning decisions, regulatory guidance and commercial situations often evolve over time.

Where new information becomes available, London Construction Magazine may update an article to reflect the latest available evidence or developments.

Examples may include:
  • updated project milestones;
  • new statements from contractors, developers or regulators;
  • changes to legislation or official guidance;
  • additional investigation findings;
  • newly released public records or data.

Where an update materially changes the context of an article, a visible update note may be added, such as:

Update: Additional information added on [date].

Clarifications

In some cases, an article may require clarification rather than correction.

This may occur where wording is technically accurate but could reasonably be misunderstood or interpreted ambiguously.

Clarifications may include revised wording, additional explanation, source clarification or expanded context.

Correction Requests

Readers, companies, public bodies, contractors, consultants, industry professionals and other stakeholders may contact London Construction Magazine to report possible inaccuracies or request corrections.

Correction requests should include:
  • the article URL;
  • a description of the issue;
  • supporting evidence or source material where available;
  • contact details for follow-up if required.

Correction requests can be submitted to:


London Construction Magazine aims to review correction requests within a reasonable timeframe, although complex or technical matters may require additional review.

Editorial Review Process

Before a substantive correction, clarification or retraction is made, the issue may be reviewed by the editorial team.

The review process may include:
  • re-checking original source material;
  • reviewing official records or documents;
  • contacting relevant parties for clarification;
  • reviewing wording and interpretation;
  • assessing whether a visible correction notice is required.

Where appropriate, London Construction Magazine may retain a visible record that an article has been corrected or updated.

Retractions

In rare situations, London Construction Magazine may retract content where the publication concludes that the article is fundamentally unreliable, materially misleading, legally problematic or based on invalid information.

Where a retraction occurs, the publication may:
  • remove the original article;
  • replace the article with a retraction notice;
  • explain the reason for the retraction where appropriate;
  • retain limited publication metadata for transparency purposes.

Retractions are used only where correction or clarification would not reasonably resolve the issue.

Transparency and Accountability

London Construction Magazine aims to correct errors openly rather than silently obscuring substantive mistakes. The publication does not intentionally maintain inaccurate information where credible evidence demonstrates that a correction is required. Corrections are considered part of the publication’s broader editorial governance and accountability framework.

Relationship to Editorial Policies

This Corrections Policy operates alongside the publication’s wider governance framework, including:

Contact

For correction requests, factual concerns, clarification requests or editorial enquiries: